HAPPY EASTER
“No man has the RIGHT to REWRITE the GOD’S WORD!”
1) http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/02/21/common-core-pornography/?show-at-comment=515808#comment-515808
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ#t=35
4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
Sunday, April 20, 2014
Common Core is a conservative win for Missouri : Stltoday
HAPPY EASTER
“No man has the RIGHT to REWRITE the GOD’S WORD!”
1) http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/02/21/common-core-pornography/?show-at-comment=515808#comment-515808
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ#t=35
4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
“No man has the RIGHT to REWRITE the GOD’S WORD!”
1) http://pjmedia.com/lifestyle/2014/02/21/common-core-pornography/?show-at-comment=515808#comment-515808
2) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
3) https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=NAgzE6s0fuQ#t=35
4) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NAgzE6s0fuQ
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
PolitiFact: Group claims education testing company promotes gay lifestyle to school children - Political Currents - MiamiHerald.com
REWRITING HISTORY to SERVE the LGBT’s AGENDA!
LGBT’s have HIGHJACKED the DEMOCRAT’s POLITICAL AGENDA in 2014!
LGBT DEMOCRATS are ATTEMPTING to REWRITE WORLD HISTORY using the COMMON CORE:
1) http://www.libertycity.org/issues
2) http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_...
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to COMPLAIN about the SPLC and the ADL's LGBT COMMON CORE RE-EDUCATION AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT and UNGODLY not to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
LGBT DEMOCRATS are ATTEMPTING to REWRITE WORLD HISTORY using the COMMON CORE:
1) http://www.libertycity.org/issues
2) http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_...
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to COMPLAIN about the SPLC and the ADL's LGBT COMMON CORE RE-EDUCATION AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT and UNGODLY not to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
Williams: Black caucus should not try to rewrite history - Richmond Times-Dispatch: Michael Paul Williams
REWRITING HISTORY to SERVE the LGBT’s AGENDA!
LGBT’s have HIGHJACKED the DEMOCRAT’s POLITICAL AGENDA in 2014!
LGBT DEMOCRATS are ATTEMPTING to REWRITE WORLD HISTORY using the COMMON CORE:
1) http://www.libertycity.org/issues
2) http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_...
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to COMPLAIN about the SPLC and the ADL's LGBT COMMON CORE RE-EDUCATION AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT and UNGODLY not to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
LGBT DEMOCRATS are ATTEMPTING to REWRITE WORLD HISTORY using the COMMON CORE:
1) http://www.libertycity.org/issues
2) http://www.traditioninaction.org/bkreviews/A_...
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to COMPLAIN about the SPLC and the ADL's LGBT COMMON CORE RE-EDUCATION AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT and UNGODLY not to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Naawp et., al., all rights unreserved
Chick-fil-A moderates its stance on gay issues – USATODAY.com
Is the LGBT GEO-POLITICAL AGENDA HARMFUL? ABSOLUTELY
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL
CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
Can all this POLITICALLY CORRECT BULL$HYT be STOPPED!
CERTAINLY!
CERTAINLY!
Is the LGBT MOVEMENT in AMERICA HARMFUL, IMMORAL and
IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
Harm is a relative term. What might be considered harmful
to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm:
physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal
thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay
marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage
has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract
between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity,
along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since
marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals.
Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society
and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is
redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means
changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the
effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education,
the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all
the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally
right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See
Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian)
So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is
damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially,
morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is
problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways
in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional
stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs.
For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to
rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for
discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur
significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the
"prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a
family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and
others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due
to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are
spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health
related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual
community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not
you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is
highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number
of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health
risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority
forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way,
there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though
there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from
stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force
morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong
in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress.
The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being
forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political
periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual
and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it
other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See
the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals
for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography,
prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These
increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a
reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of
children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate
properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people
spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People
consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on
religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support
homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's
spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in
changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is
being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being
recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc.
It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from
others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality
and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or
jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious
convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and
goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should
be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers,
masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down
because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to
homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his
disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in
his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is
he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship
service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the
congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of
legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally
conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral
dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing
fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are
they harmed?
to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm:
physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal
thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay
marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage
has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract
between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity,
along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since
marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals.
Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society
and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is
redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means
changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the
effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education,
the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all
the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally
right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See
Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian)
So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is
damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially,
morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is
problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways
in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional
stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs.
For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to
rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for
discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur
significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the
"prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a
family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and
others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due
to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are
spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health
related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual
community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not
you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is
highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number
of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health
risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority
forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way,
there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though
there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from
stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force
morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong
in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress.
The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being
forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political
periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual
and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it
other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See
the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals
for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography,
prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These
increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a
reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of
children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate
properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people
spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People
consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on
religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support
homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's
spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in
changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is
being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being
recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc.
It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from
others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality
and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or
jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious
convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and
goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should
be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers,
masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down
because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to
homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his
disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in
his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is
he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship
service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the
congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of
legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally
conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral
dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing
fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are
they harmed?
SUPERMAN is ALIVE and his earthly name is "MATT
SLICK"
SLICK"
http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resources/1056550.pdf
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to
COMPLAIN about the SPLC's LGBT AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT not
to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
COMPLAIN about the SPLC's LGBT AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT not
to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
18 Anti-Gay Groups and Their Propaganda | Southern Poverty Law Center
GOD says that it is an ABOMINATION for a MAN to LAY with a MAN and that works for U.S.!
Is the LGBT GEO-POLITICAL AGENDA HARMFUL? ABSOLUTELY
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL
CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
Can all this POLITICALLY CORRECT BULL$HYT be STOPPED!
CERTAINLY!
CERTAINLY!
Is the LGBT MOVEMENT in AMERICA HARMFUL, IMMORAL and
IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
Harm is a relative term. What might be considered harmful
to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm:
physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal
thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay
marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage
has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract
between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity,
along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since
marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals.
Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society
and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is
redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means
changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the
effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education,
the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all
the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally
right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See
Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian)
So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is
damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially,
morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is
problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways
in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional
stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs.
For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to
rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for
discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur
significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the
"prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a
family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and
others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due
to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are
spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health
related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual
community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not
you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is
highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number
of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health
risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority
forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way,
there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though
there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from
stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force
morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong
in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress.
The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being
forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political
periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual
and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it
other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See
the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals
for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography,
prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These
increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a
reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of
children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate
properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people
spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People
consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on
religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support
homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's
spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in
changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is
being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being
recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc.
It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from
others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality
and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or
jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious
convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and
goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should
be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers,
masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down
because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to
homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his
disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in
his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is
he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship
service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the
congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of
legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally
conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral
dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing
fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are
they harmed?
to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm:
physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal
thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay
marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage
has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract
between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity,
along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since
marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals.
Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society
and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is
redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means
changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the
effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education,
the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all
the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally
right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See
Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian)
So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is
damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially,
morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is
problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways
in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional
stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs.
For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to
rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for
discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur
significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the
"prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a
family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and
others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due
to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are
spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health
related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual
community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not
you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is
highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number
of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health
risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority
forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way,
there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though
there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from
stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force
morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong
in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress.
The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being
forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political
periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual
and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it
other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See
the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals
for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography,
prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These
increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a
reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of
children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate
properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people
spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People
consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on
religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support
homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's
spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in
changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is
being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being
recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc.
It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from
others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality
and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or
jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious
convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and
goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should
be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers,
masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down
because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to
homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his
disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in
his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is
he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship
service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the
congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of
legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally
conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral
dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing
fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are
they harmed?
SUPERMAN is ALIVE and his earthly name is "MATT
SLICK"
SLICK"
http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resources/1056550.pdf
NAAWP COMMENT: It may not be POLITICALLY CORRECT to
COMPLAIN about the SPLC's LGBT AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT not
to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
COMPLAIN about the SPLC's LGBT AGENDA, but it would be extremely IGNORANT not
to COMPLAIN before it's tooOOOO LATE!
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
Southern Poverty Law Center: The Real Hate Group?
Is the LGBT GEO-POLITICAL AGENDA HARMFUL? ABSOLUTELY!
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
Can all this POLITICALLY CORRECT BULL$HYT be STOPPED! CERTAINLY!
Is the LGBT MOVEMENT in AMERICA HARMFUL, IMMORAL and IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
Harm is a relative term. What might be considered harmful to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm: physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity, along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals. Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education, the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian) So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially, morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs. For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the "prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way, there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress. The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography, prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc. It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers, masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are they harmed?
SUPERMAN is ALIVE and his earthly name is "MATT SLICK"
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
The Anti-Muslim Inner Circle | Southern Poverty Law Center
Is the LGBT GEO-POLITICAL AGENDA HARMFUL? ABSOLUTELY!
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
Can all this POLITICALLY CORRECT BULL$HYT be STOPPED! CERTAINLY!
Is the LGBT MOVEMENT in AMERICA HARMFUL, IMMORAL and IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
Harm is a relative term. What might be considered harmful to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm: physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity, along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals. Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education, the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian) So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially, morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs. For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the "prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way, there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress. The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography, prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc. It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers, masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are they harmed?
SUPERMAN is ALIVE and his earthly name is "MATT SLICK"
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
The Anti-Muslim Inner Circle | Southern Poverty Law Center
Is the LGBT GEO-POLITICAL AGENDA HARMFUL? ABSOLUTELY!
Has the SPLC infiltrated the COMMON CORE EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM? DEFINITELY!
Can all this POLITICALLY CORRECT BULL$HYT be STOPPED! CERTAINLY!
Is the LGBT MOVEMENT in AMERICA HARMFUL, IMMORAL and IMPRACTICAL? Continue reading and find out!
Harm is a relative term. What might be considered harmful to one person might not to another. There are different kinds of harm: physical, emotional, spiritual, financial, etc. Therefore, harm is a personal thing that is experienced and is a bit subjective. So, when we ask how gay marriage harms anyone, we have to look at more than just one aspect. Marriage has been universally acknowledged throughout history as a legal contract between a man and a woman in which there is emotional and sexual fidelity, along with childrearing. But homosexual marriage would change this. Since marriage is also a moral issue, redefining marriage is redefining morals. Furthermore, marriage is an extremely wide-spread practice within any society and has many legal and moral issues attached to it. So, when marriage is redefined, the society is dramatically affected. Legalizing gay marriage means changing the laws of the land. The ramifications are vast and we are seeing the effects of homosexual legal "rights" affecting housing, education, the work place, medicine, the armed forces, adoption, religion, etc. Are all the changes good? That is hotly debated. But we have to ask, is it morally right to force all of society to adopt the morals of a minority? (See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian) So, how would gay marriage harm anyone? First, let's define harm. Harm is damage to a person physically, emotionally, mentally, spiritually, financially, morally, etc. The definition is obviously broad and subjective, and this is problematic. People experience harm in different ways. Here is a list of ways in which gay marriage can bring harm. It can bring huge financial and emotional stress. Homosexuals can sue people who are exercising their religious beliefs. For example, a heterosexual married couple with children who do not want to rent a room in their own family household to homosexuals could be sued for discrimination based on "sexual orientation." This can incur significant financial and emotional stress upon the family, not to mention the "prior restraint" effect of the fear of being sued which results in a family not renting out a room. The health risks are enormous to themselves and others. The fact is that homosexuals do not live as long as heterosexuals due to the health risks associated with the lifestyle, and billions of dollars are spent annually in health care for them. See Statistics on HIV/AIDS and health related issues But the HIV/AIDS epidemic is not only in the homosexual community. It has crossed over to the heterosexual community. Whether or not you want to say that HIV/AIDS is a homosexual disease, the fact is that it is highly prevalent among the gay and lesbian community due to their great number of sex partners. The collateral damage to the rest of society, as far as health risks, cannot be denied. Gay Marriage means having the morals of the minority forced upon the majority. This can also be said in the reverse. Either way, there is a problem. Normally, morals should not be forced on anyone, though there are exceptions. We force morals on others by preventing them from stealing, raping, murdering, etc. So, it is not automatically wrong to force morals on someone. But the issue then becomes what is morally right and wrong in the first place, and altering morals in a society definitely causes stress. The percentage of homosexuals in society is less than 5%, yet it is being forced upon the other 95% of society in movies, TV, literature, and political periods. See Statistics on the percentage of the population that are homosexual and lesbian. Gay Marriage means a redefinition of sexual morality, and with it other sexually related practices will be affected and this can be harmful. See the article Collateral damage effect as a result the change in sexual morals for a discussion on the increase in pedophilia, pornography, child pornography, prostitution, and sex trafficking that are occurring in the world. These increases are not due to an increase in conservative sexual morals, but a reduction of conservative sexual morals. Gay Marriage reduces the number of children born in society and we need a stable population base to operate properly. Therefore, society can be harmed. Gay Marriage affects people spiritually. Don't assume that people's spiritual beliefs are irrelevant. People consider spiritual issues to be extremely important, and the stress imposed on religious people by forcing them to "accept" and/or support homosexual practice and/or intimidate them into silence harms a person's spiritual and emotional health. It forces government to get involved in changing laws which automatically affect everyone in society. Homosexuality is being force fed to our youth via the education system. Civil unions are being recognized by employers which effect co-workers, money payouts, work time, etc. It exposes adopted children within potential homosexual unions to ridicule from others. Questions If a parent objects to a school teaching pro-homosexuality and pulls his child out of school, and because of it is ridiculed and/or jailed, is he harmed? If a self-employed business owner with strong religious convictions refuses to offer his services to homosexuals and he is sued and goes bankrupt, is he harmed? Examples of such businesses where a person should be free to refuse services could be things like wedding photographers, masseuses, tutoring, etc. If a Catholic orphanage is forced to shut down because it is against its religious moral code to turn children over to homosexual couples, is someone hurt? If a public school teacher voices his disapproval of homosexuality on Facebook on his own time, away from work, in his own home, on his own computer, and is fired from his teaching position, is he harmed? If a group of pro-homosexual activists (Act-UP) disrupt the worship service of a Christian congregation by throwing condoms at the pastor, is the congregation harmed? If Christians are forced into silence because of fear of legal, social, and financial retribution, are they harmed? When morally conservative people who disapprove of homosexuality are labeled as "moral dinosaurs," "bigots," "hate mongers," "right wing fanatics," "preachers of hatred," "intolerant," are they harmed?
SUPERMAN is ALIVE and his earthly name is "MATT SLICK"
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE thanks MATT SLICK for proving to U.S. once again that GOD'S NOT DEAD!
Second arrest made in slaying of SLU grad student | Home | The Advocate — Baton Rouge, LA
Bullying
and “Bullycide” national data and statistics.
Approximately, 160,000 U.S. public school students miss
school every day out of fear of being bullied. Many types
of bullying occurring in schools today did not exist when
we as parents and teachers were growing up. Students got
threatened, teased and bounced around a bit, but this new
type of bullying that I am talking about is occurring
in “Cyberspace!”
Cyberbullying is becoming more and more rampant in schools
across America. Social networking has provided an entirely
new environment for bullying to take place. According to
bullying statistics coming out of the White House, in 2010,
there were approximately 2.7 million students involved in
cyberbullying activities either as the perpetrator or as
the victim. Strangely, studies have actually shown that
being a victim of cyberbullying can actually lead to the
victims themselves becoming cyberbullies as a means of
retaliation.
In fact, revenge for bullying is one of the strongest
motivations for school shootings, according to recent
bullying statistics. Approximately, sixty percent of all
students felt that the number one reason students shoot at
one another at school is because they have been victims of
physical violence in their home, communities and/or at
school. Interestingly, a number of studies have also
suggested that many students act out violently on their
peers, teachers, school administrators and school staff
personnel because they are abused at home.
FACT: Over half of all public school students have
witnessed a bullying crime take place while at school.
FACT: Approximately fifteen percent of all students who do
not show up for school report it to be out of fear of being
bullied while at school.
FACT: Over seventy percent of all public school students
report bullying as an on-going problem.
FACT: Nearly ten percent of students dropping out of school
or changing from one school to another is due to repeated
bullying.
FACT: Five percent of all public school students have
actually witnessed a fellow student on campus with a gun.
FACT: Ninety percent of the bullying that is occurring in
public schools throughout America occurs between fourth
through eighth grades.
FACT: Over fifty percent of all public school students
reported that witnessing physical abuse at home can lead to
violence in school.
FACT: Sadly, homicide perpetrators were found to be twice
as likely as homicide victims to have been physically
abused by family members and/or peers during their early
childhood and adolescent years.
FACT: Over 280,000 Students are reportedly attacked on
publicly funded school campuses in America each month.
Suicide continues to be one of the leading causes of death
among children under the age of fourteen. “Bullycide” is a
new term used to describe suicide as the result of being
bullied. Clinical studies out of the Yale School of
Medicine have shown strong connections between bullying,
being bullied and suicide.
In fact, suicide rates for American public school students
have grown more than fifty percent in the past thirty years.
Bullying can include various types of behaviors from
physical attacks, to destroying one's personal property or
clothing, verbal abuse, starting rumors, name calling,
verbal aggression online, as well as, other forms of
cyberbullying.
For students who feel they are being bullied, it is
important for teachers, school counselors and school
administrators to address the matter with a parent as soon
as possible. Students need to be informed that telling on
someone for doing something wrong is always the right thing
to do. Students also need to know that in the majority of
cases when a bully is reported, the bullying stops because
the bully is faced with very serious repercussions. These
repercussions could possibly lead to expulsion,
imprisonment and parental court appearances and fines.
and “Bullycide” national data and statistics.
Approximately, 160,000 U.S. public school students miss
school every day out of fear of being bullied. Many types
of bullying occurring in schools today did not exist when
we as parents and teachers were growing up. Students got
threatened, teased and bounced around a bit, but this new
type of bullying that I am talking about is occurring
in “Cyberspace!”
Cyberbullying is becoming more and more rampant in schools
across America. Social networking has provided an entirely
new environment for bullying to take place. According to
bullying statistics coming out of the White House, in 2010,
there were approximately 2.7 million students involved in
cyberbullying activities either as the perpetrator or as
the victim. Strangely, studies have actually shown that
being a victim of cyberbullying can actually lead to the
victims themselves becoming cyberbullies as a means of
retaliation.
In fact, revenge for bullying is one of the strongest
motivations for school shootings, according to recent
bullying statistics. Approximately, sixty percent of all
students felt that the number one reason students shoot at
one another at school is because they have been victims of
physical violence in their home, communities and/or at
school. Interestingly, a number of studies have also
suggested that many students act out violently on their
peers, teachers, school administrators and school staff
personnel because they are abused at home.
FACT: Over half of all public school students have
witnessed a bullying crime take place while at school.
FACT: Approximately fifteen percent of all students who do
not show up for school report it to be out of fear of being
bullied while at school.
FACT: Over seventy percent of all public school students
report bullying as an on-going problem.
FACT: Nearly ten percent of students dropping out of school
or changing from one school to another is due to repeated
bullying.
FACT: Five percent of all public school students have
actually witnessed a fellow student on campus with a gun.
FACT: Ninety percent of the bullying that is occurring in
public schools throughout America occurs between fourth
through eighth grades.
FACT: Over fifty percent of all public school students
reported that witnessing physical abuse at home can lead to
violence in school.
FACT: Sadly, homicide perpetrators were found to be twice
as likely as homicide victims to have been physically
abused by family members and/or peers during their early
childhood and adolescent years.
FACT: Over 280,000 Students are reportedly attacked on
publicly funded school campuses in America each month.
Suicide continues to be one of the leading causes of death
among children under the age of fourteen. “Bullycide” is a
new term used to describe suicide as the result of being
bullied. Clinical studies out of the Yale School of
Medicine have shown strong connections between bullying,
being bullied and suicide.
In fact, suicide rates for American public school students
have grown more than fifty percent in the past thirty years.
Bullying can include various types of behaviors from
physical attacks, to destroying one's personal property or
clothing, verbal abuse, starting rumors, name calling,
verbal aggression online, as well as, other forms of
cyberbullying.
For students who feel they are being bullied, it is
important for teachers, school counselors and school
administrators to address the matter with a parent as soon
as possible. Students need to be informed that telling on
someone for doing something wrong is always the right thing
to do. Students also need to know that in the majority of
cases when a bully is reported, the bullying stops because
the bully is faced with very serious repercussions. These
repercussions could possibly lead to expulsion,
imprisonment and parental court appearances and fines.
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION for the ADVANCEMENT of WHITE PEOPLE
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)