Sunday, May 17, 2026
CHICAGO MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON says that putting BLACK RAPISTS, ROBBERS and MURDERERS in JAIL is RACIST!
CHICAGO MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON says that putting BLACK RAPISTS, ROBBERS and MURDERERS in JAIL is RACIST! Seriously, CHICAGO MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON says that putting BLACK RAPISTS, ROBBERS and MURDERERS in JAIL is RACIST! To make matters much worse the SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER and the AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION agree with MAYOR BRANDON JOHNSON!
MARK ANTHONY TRAINA the PRESIDENT of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF WHITE PEOPLE says that MAYOR BARNDON JOHNSON obviously belongs in a MENTAL INSTITUTION or an INSANE ASYLUM!
PUBLIC NOTICE: BLM and ANTIFA FORWARNED
ReplyDeleteLINK: https://marktraina4govna.blogspot.com/2026/05/public-notice-blm-and-antifa-forwarned.html
The SPLC had a long, long history of "DOUBLE DIPPING", TIPPING and CASHING IN!!!
ReplyDeleteIn the SPLC context, “double-dipping” is being used to describe what prosecutors say was a two‑sided strategy around white‑supremacist activity, especially the 2017 Charlottesville “Unite the Right” rally:
According to the indictment summarized in result [4], the DOJ and FBI allege that:
The SPLC covertly paid informants who were active members or organizers inside extremist/racist groups (Ku Klux Klan, Aryan Nations, National Socialist groups, etc.). One such source, “F‑37,” allegedly:
Participated in an online leadership chat that planned the Charlottesville rally.
Promoted the rally and coordinated transportation for attendees.
Made racist posts under SPLC supervision.
Received more than $270,000 from SPLC between 2015 and 2023.
Prosecutors say the SPLC routed more than $3 million from 2014–2023 to such informants via shell entities (e.g., “Center Investigative Agency,” “Fox Photography”) to disguise the payments and the connection to SPLC.
The “double-dipping” accusation in [4] refers to this alleged two‑track behavior:
On one side, SPLC was secretly funding and directing a participant in the Charlottesville rally and other extremists, allegedly helping keep extremist activity “visible.”
On the other side, SPLC publicly used the Charlottesville rally and the broader threat of extremism as a major fundraising and branding vehicle, portraying itself as an outside watchdog warning donors that extremism was surging.
So “double-dipping” here means, in the prosecutors’ framing and in critical media coverage: benefiting from the same extremist events twice—first by allegedly helping enable or amplify them via paid insiders, and then by raising money and influence off the resulting outrage and fear.
SPLC’s own position (not detailed in your snippets but reported elsewhere) is that these were legitimate informant operations to monitor and disrupt violent groups, and that the government’s “double-dipping” narrative is politically motivated. The legal question will be whether the payments and instructions crossed the line from undercover intelligence work into fraud, money laundering, and effectively helping create the very threats the group was fundraising to fight.